Skip to content
Silk Road— Case Archive
evidenceevidencetestimony2015 Federal TrialDefense proffer of a reported offer by Karpeles' attorneys to identify the Silk Road operator in exchange for leniencyOn Day 3, Dratel sought admission of the reported offer, while Turner objected to multiple hearsay layers and inadequate notice under Rule 807. The court deferred a definitive admissibility ruling until Tuesday.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

Defense proffer of a reported offer by Karpeles' attorneys to identify the Silk Road operator in exchange for leniency

On Day 3, Dratel sought admission of the reported offer, while Turner objected to multiple hearsay layers and inadequate notice under Rule 807. The court deferred a definitive admissibility ruling until Tuesday.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The defense argued that the reported offer mattered to its theory that Karpeles had set up Ulbricht, regardless of whether Karpeles could actually identify the operator.

Trial Record (1)