Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialDer-Yeghiayan's search-warrant affidavit concerning Karpeles, described by defense counsel as supporting proposed cross-examinationDefense counsel described the affidavit as asserting probable cause to believe Karpeles operated Silk Road and used it to sell narcotics, citing software similarities and technical expertise. The government raised competency and hearsay objections, and the court outlined permissible questions about personal observations while leaving the broader dispute open for written submissions.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Der-Yeghiayan's search-warrant affidavit concerning Karpeles, described by defense counsel as supporting proposed cross-examination

Defense counsel described the affidavit as asserting probable cause to believe Karpeles operated Silk Road and used it to sell narcotics, citing software similarities and technical expertise. The government raised competency and hearsay objections, and the court outlined permissible questions about personal observations while leaving the broader dispute open for written submissions.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The defense proposed using the affidavit to explore another possible Silk Road operator, while the government disputed whether its probable-cause assertions supplied competent evidence or a basis for impeachment.

Trial Record (1)