← All EvidenceProceduralFactual Writing Comparisons Allowed; Agent Conclusions Excluded
Documents & Records
DPR forum posts and other DPR material identified by the prosecution as comparison material
The prosecution identified DPR forum posts and other available DPR material as the writings compared with mises.org posts. The court permitted questions about specific word usage and verification efforts, but not a conclusion that the writings shared the same style.
About
The court allowed factual word-usage comparisons with the mises.org posts but prohibited conclusions about shared writing style, authorship, or DPR's identity.