Skip to content
Silk Road— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialDraft jury instructions revised for wording, materials not sent to the jury room, and unanimity on Count Four's continuing series of violationsThe court directed three unopposed revisions: replacing adage with phrase, using actual computer hard drives rather than seized narcotics as an example of material not going to the jury room, and clarifying Count Four's unanimity requirement. The court said these changes would appear in the version intended for delivery.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Draft jury instructions revised for wording, materials not sent to the jury room, and unanimity on Count Four's continuing series of violations

The court directed three unopposed revisions: replacing adage with phrase, using actual computer hard drives rather than seized narcotics as an example of material not going to the jury room, and clarifying Count Four's unanimity requirement. The court said these changes would appear in the version intended for delivery.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The revised Count Four instruction required jurors to agree unanimously on which three or more narcotics violations constituted the continuing series.

Trial Record (1)