Skip to content
Silk Road— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedigital2015 Federal TrialLaptop records and journals that Dratel said the government would attribute to RossIn his Day 1 opening statement, Dratel disputed the expected attribution of the laptop's journals and other records to Ulbricht as DPR. He argued that retaining years of incriminating material while using a public-library computer connection was inconsistent with the security-conscious operator described by the government.
← All Evidence
Digital Evidence

Laptop records and journals that Dratel said the government would attribute to Ross

In his Day 1 opening statement, Dratel disputed the expected attribution of the laptop's journals and other records to Ulbricht as DPR. He argued that retaining years of incriminating material while using a public-library computer connection was inconsistent with the security-conscious operator described by the government.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Dratel used the laptop records to frame the defense's attribution dispute, arguing that their presence conflicted with the government's portrayal of DPR's security practices.

Trial Record (1)