Skip to content
Silk Road— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedigital2015 Federal TrialRAM captureBeeson agreed that the full range of contemporaneous computer activity could no longer be reconstructed through the RAM capture, while qualifying his answers about internet connections and possible malware or viruses. He also testified that this limitation did not prevent examination of computer content from years earlier.
← All Evidence
Digital Evidence

RAM capture

Beeson agreed that the full range of contemporaneous computer activity could no longer be reconstructed through the RAM capture, while qualifying his answers about internet connections and possible malware or viruses. He also testified that this limitation did not prevent examination of computer content from years earlier.

2 proceedings2 mentions1 trial

Trial Record (2)