Skip to content
Silk Road— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedigital2015 Federal Trial212ADuring his Day 11 closing argument, Dratel questioned how the displayed timestamp could be explained given the arrest time he described as approximately 3 p.m. Pacific time that day.
← All Evidence
Digital Evidence

212A

During his Day 11 closing argument, Dratel questioned how the displayed timestamp could be explained given the arrest time he described as approximately 3 p.m. Pacific time that day.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial
Also known as (1)
  • Record showing homepage.php with an October 1, 2013, 8:46 p.m. timestamp

About

The defense cited the timestamp as an alleged post-arrest anomaly to challenge the integrity and attribution of the digital evidence.

Trial Record (1)