Skip to content
Silk Road— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal Trial3501-0002After reviewing the document, Alford acknowledged referring to Ulbricht as the original DPR on December 30, 2013. He nevertheless denied finding evidence that more than one person was DPR.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

3501-0002

After reviewing the document, Alford acknowledged referring to Ulbricht as the original DPR on December 30, 2013. He nevertheless denied finding evidence that more than one person was DPR.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial
Also known as (1)
  • Document marked 3501-0002

About

The defense used the prior wording to challenge continuous attribution to Ulbricht, but the wording did not establish that Alford believed there were multiple operators.

Trial Record (1)