Skip to content
personpersonBridget PrinceBridget PrinceInvestigator and researcher who ran One World Research.← All People
WitnessOne World Research

Bridget Prince

Investigator and researcher who ran One World Research.

24 lines·6 proceedings·5 mentions

About

Bridget Prince, an investigator retained by the defense, identified a text file named market rewrite on Ulbricht's laptop during her Day 11 testimony. The court admitted it as Defendant's Exhibit M without objection, and defense counsel read part of its software-task list. Prince also reported finding approximately six emails from Ulbricht's Google account for June 24–28, 2013.

Before she testified, the prosecution challenged a proposed timeline and summary presentation as resembling closing argument and questioned its firsthand basis. The court distinguished Prince's personal observations from speculation or a synthesis of other witnesses' accounts. The defense withdrew the timeline. The court allowed Prince to describe documents and date ranges she personally observed in the Google production, but not to interpret the records or draw conclusions from their presence or absence.

Defense counsel kept readings from the complaint separate from Prince's testimony. The prosecution declined cross-examination, and she was excused. In closing, defense counsel used Exhibit M to argue that DPR could keep a computerized task list and that handwritten notes found at Ulbricht's residence were more likely notes taken during a telephone call. That interpretation was counsel's argument, not Prince's testimony.

Trial Record (6)

20152015 Federal TrialJan 13, 2015 – Feb 4, 2015Called by defense

Bridget Prince testified for the defense on Day 11 about her review of Ulbricht's laptop image and Google account records. She identified a software-task list admitted as Defendant's Exhibit M and reported finding approximately six emails for June 24–28, 2013.

Day 10

Day 11

ProceduralDefense Documentary Evidence and Prince Testimony Limits1highlightMentioned

Summary

The court limited Prince to factual observations of records and allowed disputed complaint-derived readings with contextual safeguards; defense documents remained under review.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

rulingThe court allowed Prince to describe her personal observations of the Google production but barred interpretation or conclusions from the presence or absence of records.Open in transcript →
DirectBridget Prince — DirectBridget PrinceJoshua Lewis Dratel2highlightsMentioned24lines spoken

Summary

Bridget Prince identified an admitted laptop file and reported approximately six emails from Mr. Ulbricht's Google account during June 24–28, 2013.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (2)

evidence eventPrince identified the laptop text file named market rewrite. The court admitted it as Defendant's Exhibit M without objection, and defense counsel later read part of its list of software tasks.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightPrince testified that her review found approximately six emails from Mr. Ulbricht's Google account during June 24–28, 2013.Open in transcript →