Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocument2015 Federal TrialDefense Exhibit EThe defense showed a version it had redacted to Jared Der-Yeghiayan on Day 4 to refresh his recollection, but he did not recall seeing it before. On Day 10, the defense argued that the document showed information reaching DPR, rather than proving that Athavale was DPR.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Defense Exhibit E

The defense showed a version it had redacted to Jared Der-Yeghiayan on Day 4 to refresh his recollection, but he did not recall seeing it before. On Day 10, the defense argued that the document showed information reaching DPR, rather than proving that Athavale was DPR.

6 proceedings6 mentions1 trial
Also known as (3)
  • Defense-redacted material shown in an attempt to refresh recollection
  • Previously excluded Defendant's E, which defense counsel stated he otherwise would have sought to introduce through Prince
  • Previously precluded document the defense proposed authenticating through Shaw

About

The court excluded the exhibit as hearsay on Day 10, finding that its proposed use depended on Athavale being DPR or a potential DPR despite the defense's claimed nontruth purpose. The court also applied the requirement that alternative-perpetrator evidence connect the asserted perpetrator to the charged crime rather than invite unsupported speculation.

Trial Record (6)