Skip to content
personpersonMark KarpelesMark KarpelesOwner of the Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange.← All People
Mentioned

Mark Karpeles

Owner of the Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange.

13 proceedings·13 mentions

About

Mark Karpeles, owner of the Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange, became a focus of the defense's theory that someone other than Ulbricht operated Silk Road as Dread Pirate Roberts (DPR). During Joshua Dratel's cross-examination, HSI agent Jared Der-Yeghiayan described investigating Karpeles before Ulbricht came to his attention in September 2013. He confirmed that silkroadmarket.org used a hosting company owned by Karpeles and described matching MediaWiki version numbers on websites he compared. He also acknowledged that he had not examined Karpeles' computers, phone, or overseas servers. The court instructed jurors that unverified online claims about Karpeles' programming expertise were not proof of that expertise. On redirect, Der-Yeghiayan explained that MediaWiki was freely downloadable; later testimony clarified that the associated hosting-support inbox served multiple customers.

Judge Katherine B. Forrest allowed admissible factual evidence supporting an alternative-operator theory but barred the agent's beliefs, suspicions, and legal conclusions about culpability. She also excluded an alleged offer through Karpeles' lawyers to identify DPR in exchange for leniency. Over the defense's waiver objection, she directed counsel to proceed as though identified earlier testimony would be struck, while explaining that other factual evidence concerning Karpeles would remain. Dratel returned to Karpeles' hosting connections and investigative gaps in closing argument, and prosecutor Timothy Howard challenged the suggested connection in rebuttal. Those competing arguments did not establish that Karpeles operated as DPR.

Trial Record (13)

20152015 Federal TrialJan 13, 2015 – Feb 4, 2015

Mark Karpeles figured in the defense's alternative-operator theory through questions about his hosting business, Mt. Gox, and an earlier federal investigation. The court permitted factual evidence about those connections but barred the investigator's suspicions and conclusions about culpability.

Day 3

Day 4

ProceduralWaiver Objection and Ruling to Strike Karpeles Testimony1highlightMentioned

Summary

The court rejected the defense's waiver argument, directed exclusion of selected agent testimony, and denied a break until the next day. Other evidence concerning Mark Karpeles would remain.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

rulingThe court directed counsel to proceed on the basis that the identified excerpts would be struck, while retaining other evidence concerning Mark Karpeles. It planned a later general jury instruction and agreed to review the individual questions and answers again.Open in transcript →

Day 5

Day 11

ClosingClosing Argument - Joshua Lewis DratelJoshua Lewis Dratel1highlightMentioned

Summary

Dratel sought acquittal on every count, disputing DPR's identity, digital reliability, and bitcoin tracing while relying on Bates and character testimony.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

otherDratel challenged file timestamps and digital attribution, then discussed the investigations of Mark Karpeles and Anand Athavale as part of the defense's alternative-perpetrator argument.Open in transcript →