3.Jared Der-Yeghiayan — Cross (Part 6)
1,200 linesCROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. DRATEL:
MR. DRATEL: Good morning, Agent Der-Yeghiayan, is that right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is right, yes, sir.
MR. DRATEL: Why don't we talk about the PGP demonstration, the key that you did this morning.
MR. DRATEL: And just initially, there were forum posts, weren't, there's, that people couldn't validate with the public key, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: And a private key, which you talked about, is just a block of text like the public key that you showed, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And when you use the term own a private key, you just mean have possession of that block of text, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: So it could be cut and paste and sent to someone else, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it can.
MR. DRATEL: It could be shared by the person who generated the key, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: It could be stolen --
MR. DRATEL: -- correct?
It doesn't have to be the same person who uses that private key from message to message much less year to year, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It doesn't have to be, no.
MR. DRATEL: And it doesn't have to be the same device that uses that key from message to message, from month to month, year to year, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: It is really the block of text. It is not whether it is a laptop or a desk-top or a phone or anything like that, right, it is the block of text that counts, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is universal, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So the only thing that you know when you verify is that you're communicating with someone who is using that block of text, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: It doesn't have to be the same person from message to message, just a person who is using that block of text?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: And let me clarify. It is the same text and there is also a password that is associated with utilizing that private key as well, too.
MR. DRATEL: Right. But the same thing. The password is just like any other password? It could be typed in? It could be shared? It could be sent? It could be cut and paste? Right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: It could be hacked, right?
MR. DRATEL: So I just want to go back to that question.
So the only thing that you can verify is that you're communicating with someone who has that block of text and can enter the password?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And these keys can be passed on, correct, from person to person?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It can be shared, yes.
MR. DRATEL: In that way it is not really any different on a certain level than a car key, right? It can go from driver to driver and you operate the car, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Well, it can but it needs a password, too.
MR. DRATEL: Right. So if you had to, let's say, enter something into a car like on a punch key or something like that, it would be the same difference, right? All you had to do is a password?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It would be key plus the password, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Yes. The same thing if the office manager retires and has the key to the file cabinet and there is maybe also not only the key but also a little keypad on it and the next office manager comes along and says here's the file key and here's the code for the key punch, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Now, what you showed us on the exhibit was that the key was created April 1, 2011, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And it wasn't created as Dread Pirate Roberts, right? There is nothing about that key that says Dread Pirate Roberts, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: It says Silk Road, right?
MR. DRATEL: By the way, the person who creates that key would still have the information -- even if it was passed on, they still have that block of text, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm sorry. I am confused.
MR. DRATEL: Let me go through it again.
The person who created the key, generates the key, created the key, they would retain that block of text forever, essentially, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They could save it, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Even if someone else was using the key, even if they passed on -- the office manager could have made a copy of the file key, right -- of the file cabinet key, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right. There could be multiple copies of a private key that multiple people can have.
MR. DRATEL: And multiple people could use it at the same time?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They could, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Message to messaging?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They could.
MR. DRATEL: You talked about Dread Pirate Roberts and the movie "The Princess Bride," right?
MR. DRATEL: In fairness to the author, you know it was also a book originally?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was a book, yes. I didn't read it, though.
MR. DRATEL: Part of that legend is continuity, right?
MR. DRATEL: And the continuity being that the essence of the personality stays the same, correct?
MR. DRATEL: And if the key changed -- withdrawn.
If DPR had changed over time and the private key changed over time, that would ruin that continuity, wouldn't it?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That would create some doubt.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, you yourself thought that DPR changed over time, didn't you?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There are times that there was writings that would make me think that, yeah, it potentially was a different person.
MR. DRATEL: And even as late as August of 2013, you thought that DPR had changed in April of 2013, didn't you?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was discussions that I had had with another moderator who was convinced that it was a new DPR.
MR. DRATEL: But you told people inside your organization, Homeland Security Investigations, that DPR -- you believed that DPR had changed in April of 2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There -- if there is anything that you could refresh my memory?
MR. DRATEL: Sure. Just for the witness, 3505-787.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: Your Honor, I understand it can't be done electronically from our position. I guess only from the main -- I will just show him.
THE COURT: I think it is fine if you just show it in hardcopy to the witness, and let the government know what you are turning his attention to.
MR. DRATEL: Yes. It is 3505-787.
(Handing)
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Thank you.
MR. DRATEL: Obviously, just read it to yourself, the top part.
MR. DRATEL: And so in August of 2013, you expressed your opinion that DPR had changed in April of 2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm not sure if the April I was referring to was 2012 or 2013. The April might have been from 2012.
MR. DRATEL: But it is April?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: April.
MR. DRATEL: I'm sorry. The email is August of 2013, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you talk about someone with a screen name who you thought might have been the previous DPR, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There is another profile that was administrator on Silk Road as well.
MR. DRATEL: And you thought that even though you knew that the private key was the same as it always had been, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: You thought there was a different DPR notwithstanding the continuity of the private key?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was conversation that would change, and it would be similar in a lot of ways but there would be other things that would make us think that potentially there might have been a different person behind it at different times.
MR. DRATEL: What I'm saying is even notwithstanding this same private key throughout, you expressed an opinion in August of 2013, basically two months before Mr. Ulbricht's arrest, correct, that DPR had changed in April, and now you don't know whether it is 2012 or 2013 in April, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct. I think it was April of 2012, though.
MR. DRATEL: But it doesn't say 2012, does it?
MR. DRATEL: That is not what you put in your email, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It says just April.
MR. DRATEL: Right. In August of 2013, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't think it is April 2013.
MR. DRATEL: No. No. what I am saying is the email is August of 2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: August, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And when you say it changed in April, you didn't say April a year ago, you said April, right?
MR. DRATEL: Have you taken any acting courses?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I have not.
MR. DRATEL: What kind of computer training have you had?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Just the basic stuff that we had from the academy.
MR. DRATEL: What did that include?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There are various courses on -- just basic computer classes for maintaining evidence and also documenting things as well as we also have for submitting subpoenas and things that are related to computers and investigating computer crimes, just a basic overview course.
MR. DRATEL: OK. So nothing about computer deception, right?
MR. DRATEL: Nothing about how to assume an online identity different from your actual identity, right?
MR. DRATEL: But you were able to do that flawlessly, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I was.
MR. DRATEL: You operated a number of accounts, maybe two dozen over time, maybe more, right, on Silk Road at some point or another?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm not sure of the exact number but there was over a dozen.
MR. DRATEL: And you were an administrator communicating directly with Dread Pirate Roberts every couple of days, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Communicating with the other administrators -- inigo, libertas -- right?
MR. DRATEL: Anybody else, administrators who you communicated with?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: samesamebutdifferent
MR. DRATEL: And they never -- withdrawn.
Yes. They didn't know that you were a law enforcement agent?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, they did not.
MR. DRATEL: Dread Pirate Roberts didn't know you were a law enforcement agent?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, he did not.
MR. DRATEL: None of the people you interacted with on the vendor support or any kind of other -- with Silk Road users, none of them knew, right, that Cirrus was a law enforcement agent, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Without any training, you were able to do that?
MR. DRATEL: You had multiple persona at the same time, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There were multiple identities that I would operate.
MR. DRATEL: At the same time online, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah, during different periods.
MR. DRATEL: And, again, without any glitch in terms of you never gave it away; no one ever said, oh, I know you're a cop, get off the site, right?
MR. DRATEL: In fact, you weren't sure yourself often who you were communicating with on the site despite their screen name, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was always a level of distrust as to potentially who you might be talking to. So there would be ways that we would try to always authenticate one another through just different language and common things that we would say to one another.
MR. DRATEL: And, in fact, there were times when you thought that DPR might be operating some of the other administrator accounts, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was, yeah, there was times that we didn't know who was operating what accounts.
MR. DRATEL: And at one point it was pretty frustrating, right, for your investigation purposes, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was very difficult, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, at one point you said "Who's on first," right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That would probably be something that I would say.
MR. DRATEL: I mean, literally, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: If there was an email, yeah, I'm pretty sure, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: OK.
MR. DRATEL: May I approach, your Honor?
THE COURT: You may.
MR. DRATEL: It was a little more complicated than I had hoped it would be.
(Pause)
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Thank you.
MR. DRATEL: It is the bottom of the first page, and then it is double-sided so just flip over to the top of the next page.
(Pause)
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I recall this, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So you said, "Sheesh, who's on first," right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: "Sheesh, who's on first again."
MR. DRATEL: Because it was a complicated situation as to whether or not someone was commandeering someone else's account and who you are actually communicating with, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. Specifically in this period of time there was multiple things going on with multiple accounts.
MR. DRATEL: And that's June of 2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That was June 2013, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And Cirrus was an account that you took over, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it was.
MR. DRATEL: And Cirrus was originally an account that was called Scout, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it was Scout before.
MR. DRATEL: And you ultimately cultivated Scout to give up the account, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The person that originally had, yeah, the Scout account became Cirrus originally and then gave it over to me, yes.
MR. DRATEL: At some point because you revealed to them that you were law enforcement, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The original operator didn't know that I was law enforcement, yes.
MR. DRATEL: No, but I'm saying at some point you did reveal it and then they let you assume their account?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They knew that I was law enforcement when they let me assume the account, yes.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, you were surprised when you found out Scout was female, right?
MR. DRATEL: One of your challenges in getting Scout to relinquish her account and give you access to Scout, and then ultimately to Cirrus, was how to convince Scout that you were law enforcement and that DPR was tricking her -- him you thought at the time but her and that her better option, or Scout's better option was to go with the law enforcement, you had to do that online in a way that didn't impair the investigation, correct?
MR. TURNER: Objection to form.
THE COURT: If you understand the question, you can answer it.
MR. DRATEL: I will break it down.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I guess the response is that I wasn't -- I didn't portray myself as law enforcement to Scout. That was another agent that did that. I had another account at that time that I was utilizing to talk to Scout that they did not know -- I wasn't portrayed as law enforcement.
MR. DRATEL: But that was a challenge for the investigation, correct, as a whole?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: A challenge, I'm sorry, to?
MR. DRATEL: To convince Scout, whether it was you or a colleague of yours, to convince Scout that DPR was tricking Scout and that Scout's better option was to essentially align with law enforcement?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That was another agent's goal with another account that they were utilizing. My particular goal with the account that I was utilizing was to try to get Scout to buy something from me which would then result in exchanging their name and address.
MR. DRATEL: Right. That is ultimately what happened, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is what happened.
MR. DRATEL: I'm saying, the other agent's challenge was this other aspect of trying to do something online that would convince Scout to essentially relinquish her account to law enforcement?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: I want to go back to the beginning of your testimony.
And the first time that any of this came on the radar at Chicago O'Hare International mail was June of 2011?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was roughly the first time that I saw a few of the packages that contained ecstasy.
MR. DRATEL: Then you started the investigation in October of 2011?
MR. DRATEL: And you told us that the seizures began to increase after June 2011, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Prior to that there were hardly any -- nothing to note, if there was anything noteworthy?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, by October -- in October of 2011, there were only four seizures that year.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That month I believe that we maintained, that we held for our investigation, there were four seizures.
MR. DRATEL: And then that multiplied by 2012 and throughout the months of 2012, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. They steadily increased over that period.
MR. DRATEL: And you said you had never seen that ecstasy before, right? You testified --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I hadn't seen it in the mail in the letter class like that before.
MR. DRATEL: That is right. OK. Also, these Netherlands' shippers, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I had never seen packaging like that before.
MR. DRATEL: So anything that would have happened on Silk Road before June of 2011 really would not have come to your attention at all, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It potentially could have. If there was a seizure that was made, we would have been called.
MR. DRATEL: But you don't know is what I am saying?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know, no.
MR. DRATEL: You have no idea really where the packages -- you don't know anything about any of the transactions before June 2011?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't.
MR. DRATEL: And you had been there for years, in some form or another, at O'Hare as either border patrol or HSI?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Customs and Border Protection and HSI.
MR. DRATEL: CBP?
MR. DRATEL: Customs and Border Patrol.
And one of the things that -- well, withdrawn.
In June 2011, there was an article on gawker.com about Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, there was.
MR. DRATEL: And the traffic on Silk Road increased significantly after that, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That was about the time, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And also there was an NPR report in October 2011, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: As I have been told, yes.
MR. DRATEL: That also publicized it, and, again, you started seeing an increase in traffic?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That was what came out of an interview, I believe.
MR. DRATEL: Now, you talked about border authority initially. Basically, without a warrant, you have the authority to pretty much search anything that is coming in, right, to the United States?
MR. DRATEL: You say you do a lot of x-ray and other -- and canines, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: X-ray, canine, and then searching by hand as well.
MR. DRATEL: Now, all of the screenshots that you put in evidence of the silkroad.onion, they are all from 2012 or later, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The majority of them, yes. Actually, all of them, yes, pretty much.
MR. DRATEL: And were you on the site at all before 2012?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was.
MR. DRATEL: Late 2011?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Late 2011.
MR. DRATEL: After you started your investigation?
MR. DRATEL: So do you know when Silk Road first began charging commissions?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was apparent from the beginning they started, from what I read, they were on commissions.
MR. DRATEL: You think it is from the very start?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe it was, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Did you ever look at the initial transaction history?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I didn't have that.
MR. DRATEL: But you have it now, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I have the transaction history --
MR. DRATEL: Yes. You have access to it, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I haven't reviewed it but I have access to it.
MR. DRATEL: You haven't reviewed it, right. So it is your assumption that the commissions go back to the beginning?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: But you don't know for sure?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know for sure.
MR. DRATEL: How about the escrow system, do you know when that was instituted on Silk Road?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe that is from the beginning, from when we released our first buys.
MR. DRATEL: Your first buys were when?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe it was January 2012.
MR. DRATEL: So it has already been in existence for eight/nine months already, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: So you don't know anything about the transactions before then with respect to an escrow system other than when you started making purchases, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know when Silk Road first launched its Wiki page?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't recall offhand.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know whether it was when it launched the forum, before or after?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The forum was around June 2011.
MR. DRATEL: Right. So do you know whether it was launched before or after the forum?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know if it was before or after it.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know what the seller's guide looked like in June or July or August or September of 2011, before you first got on that site?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I do not.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know what the buyer's guide looked like during that same time period before you got on the site?
MR. DRATEL: Do you know if there was a seller's contract of the type where it says "I agree" before you got on the site?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I do not.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know when the first heroin sale on Silk Road was made?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I do not.
MR. DRATEL: Cocaine?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I do not.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know when Silk Road first offered forgeries?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I do not -- well, actually, from the posting that was made from Dread Pirate Roberts, I can assume that that might have been when it was announced.
MR. DRATEL: When was that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I would have to look back at the screenshot.
MR. DRATEL: With respect to 116B, which is not forgeries but the hacking tools, right, there was something called an RAT? Is that a remote access trojan, do you know what that is?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I am assuming a trojan that you can access remotely.
MR. DRATEL: Trojan means something you implant into somebody's computer, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is something that would conceal itself as something else as someone's computer that might be downloaded inadvertently, a program perhaps.
MR. DRATEL: And then allow others to operate it, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It could do things like that, yes.
MR. DRATEL: This is already in evidence, Government 106, Tor. I want to talk about Tor a little bit. OK?
MR. DRATEL: Would you show government's 106, please.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: That is it. Thank you.
MR. DRATEL: So that is the diagram where you explained somewhat how Tor operates, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And if the user, let's say, on the left initiates a communication, right, that first computer is the entry node, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And the one on the right, where it says "Web server (hidden service)," where it goes from that last computer to the hidden service, is an exit node, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, that wouldn't be an exit node.
MR. DRATEL: Where were the exit nodes?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: This isn't completely accurate. I think it is for simple use. But, generally, exit nodes are on the outside but a hidden service is generally within, and there is what is called intrapoints that protect the hidden service, which they are all relays, essentially, within Tor.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Obviously, there is a lot more computers than this, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. There is a lot more relays and nodes.
MR. DRATEL: That's why it works is because there are enough computers worldwide on the Tor network to permit the relays not to be traced?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. There is -- they are all documented as well.
MR. DRATEL: And when you say "documented" --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There is lists of IPs for the relays and for the nodes.
MR. DRATEL: Right. But, nevertheless, because of the way it is done, it's very difficult, if not impossible, to trace, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is very difficult to trace, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And some people think that by monitoring exit nodes and looking at traffic, you can find hidden services, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: We thought that we could earlier on but we realized fairly quickly that we couldn't.
MR. DRATEL: And let's try to put it in a different analogy. If you're the user on the left and you get into a car on the street and then someone sees you get into the car on the street and then you go on the highway and you stop and you change cars and you stop and you change cars and you stop and you change cars and you stop and you change cars, when you get to the destination, no one may be able to find you, right, because assuming that that -- that you are not being surveilled the whole way through, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is a fair analogy, yes.
MR. DRATEL: By the way, 125H, Government's 125H, just if you want to look at it, for the forgeries.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: August of 2011.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Thank you. Now, Tor is not, as you said, not illegal. In fact, it is widely used by millions of users to access typical Internet activity, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And, for example, people, let's say, Chinese nationals in China use Tor to get around governmental restrictions on their Internet activity, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you talked about torproject.org, right, which is a website on the open Web, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it is on the regular Internet.
MR. DRATEL: Ordinary Web, we'll call it, on the ordinary Internet.
And that will allow you to download Tor, correct?
MR. DRATEL: And you have been on that page, right?
MR. DRATEL: And so you know that Tor was originally developed by the U.S. government -- U.S. Naval research, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It originally was, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And designed for sensitive military and government communications; that's what it was designed to facilitate?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe it was between Navy ships trying to create a new network to communicate between them.
MR. DRATEL: But now it's used by not only the military, journalists, law enforcement, as I say, people in countries where Internet is restricted, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: It also has real-world advantages for ordinary people, right -- well, withdrawn.
Ordinary people can use it so that they aren't monitored by commercial establishments, websites, and others so that they will know their buying habits and can target them for merchandising and things like that, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: You can use it to protect essentially your identity, yeah, and who you are.
MR. DRATEL: So, for example, if a website uses your search history and your buying history to decide whether you should get a discount or not, depending on your buying habits and how often you buy retail and how often you use a discount, Tor could prevent them from discriminating one way or the other -- the website against a customer who uses Tor to gain access to those sites, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. They could be tracking by your IP address, and if you constantly visit certain sites it will remember you and it could learn your buying habits and things, too. So, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So what Tor really does is prevent whoever can, or would, from monitoring a person's Internet tracking?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It can, yes.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, you can use Tor as a law enforcement officer to either visit a website or some other part of the Internet without the other side knowing that it is law enforcement that's viewing a page, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It could be used for law enforcement, yes.
MR. DRATEL: It is like having a No Caller ID, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right. It won't come back to an IP address that is a government IP.
MR. DRATEL: And a lot of people got No Caller ID for that kind of reason, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Now, "hidden service" just really means that it is on Tor alone, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That it is built within Tor and that is the website that it is accessible.
MR. DRATEL: It is only accessible --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Only accessible on Tor, yes.
MR. DRATEL: It could be anything. It could be something that someone in Iran doesn't want censored, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Just by being a hidden service doesn't make it illegal.
MR. DRATEL: There is nothing sinister about that connotation, that description, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Now, let's talk about seizures. And you had an exhibit with all of the boxes, right --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: All the seizures.
MR. DRATEL: -- that you made at Chicago O'Hare International mail of illegal -- of contraband coming into the United States, right? All of that was drugs, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it was all primarily drugs.
MR. DRATEL: And it was primarily -- withdrawn.
There was nothing on the packaging that said "As advertised on Silk Road," or something like that, right? There was nothing that said it was ordered off of Silk Road, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. I never recall seeing any envelope that said Silk Road on it.
MR. DRATEL: So you connected them to Silk Road because you would match the product with something that was advertised for sale on Silk Road, correct?
MR. DRATEL: But you don't have any proof that that was actually ordered off of Silk Road, what you seized?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Only what we were able to make by comparing it to our controlled purchases.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Only the purchases that you made, right? You were able to go on the Internet, put in the information, the fake address that you used, and then it would come to that address and then you would confirm that it was off of Silk Road.
But that room full of drugs, none of that is confirmed that it came off of Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There is at least one vendor that we did arrest that told us --
MR. DRATEL: Objection.
THE COURT: Overruled. He can finish.
MR. DRATEL: OK.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That during a proffer later that stated -- that confirmed that several of the packages that I showed him that were part of that collection that were mailed directly from him through Silk Road.
MR. DRATEL: And he told you that, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, he did.
MR. DRATEL: OK. There were also other websites on Tor that sell drugs, right, through the mail and through -- right? Through the mail?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There is other hidden services that would sell drugs, too, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And some of them -- withdrawn.
So the only thing that connects all but those few that you just talked about of seizures, all that connects them to Silk Road is that those items were advertised on Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: For the ones that we did, for our buys. The other ones, yeah, were comparative analysis.
MR. DRATEL: So if I saw a book on Amazon and then I ordered it from Barnes & Noble and it came in a package that didn't say where it was -- that didn't have either -- anything on it, can you assume where it came from -- can you confirm, rather, can you conclude that it came from Barnes & Noble's or Amazon if they both sell it just because it advertises on Amazon?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I couldn't necessarily confirm it just from looking at it.
MR. DRATEL: It wouldn't even have to be off of sites; people could be on Tor chat or some other private messaging, PGP, Pidgin, be in direct contact with drug dealers overseas or in the United States, order drugs through the mail?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It could have been, yeah, independent from a market.
MR. DRATEL: What could also happen is that someone could have been on a site, any of the Tor sites, any of the hidden services that might sell drugs, purchase ones off the site and then initiate a private conversation with the person who actually sold the drugs and do all the rest of the sales privately, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is a possibility, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And they could tell all their friends how to do it, too, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. I suppose that is possible, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Now, at some point you stopped making seizures, right?
MR. DRATEL: You had plenty, right?
MR. DRATEL: We saw the room full of seizures.
The highest volume was ecstasy, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The highest volume for the drugs that we maintained were ecstasy.
MR. DRATEL: By a large margin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: By a large margin.
MR. DRATEL: And heroin was only 261 grams, right, of heroin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe that is about right, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And about 457 grams of cocaine, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That sounds about right.
MR. DRATEL: That is May of 2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
THE COURT: Let me just make sure I understand. So counsel was questioning you about the room full of boxes, is that right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
THE COURT: And your statements were in connection with the room full of boxes?
THE COURT: So is it the case that you examined the contents of each of the boxes and that based upon your examination of those contents the quantities were as you testified?
THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
You may proceed.
MR. DRATEL: Thank you, your Honor.
BY MR. DRATEL:
MR. DRATEL: You talked a fair amount of bitcoin in your direct testimony, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I did.
MR. DRATEL: Bitcoin was an essential element of Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And the exchanges that you talked about that were used to cash out, the ones you talked about, like Mt. Gox and others, were all on the ordinary Internet, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: They are not hidden services, they are not on Tor?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They are regular websites, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And even any exchanges that were made on the page or as a result of the people who were advertising on the page that you showed in Silk Road to exchange bitcoins, all of those things, all of those transactions still wind up on the block chain, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Not internally within Silk Road it wouldn't. If it was a transfer between one account to another, that wouldn't be reflected in the block chain.
MR. DRATEL: No, but if you were cashing out.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: If you were cashing it out and taking it off of Silk Road, yes, that would be reflected on the block chain.
MR. DRATEL: The block chain, again, is this public ledger, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: That records every bitcoin transaction where -- in terms of everything that goes from bitcoin to cash, cash to bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Every transaction, basically just a transfer of bitcoins between one address and another is documented.
MR. DRATEL: So even bitcoin to bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Everything essentially is bitcoin to bitcoin. There might be a cash transaction that occurs outside of that, but the block chain just reflects that you just moved a bitcoin from one address to another.
MR. DRATEL: I can't take -- there is no physical bitcoin, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There is things that have been made into physical form that they sell as bitcoins that have the private key on it, but it is all done electronically, essentially.
MR. DRATEL: Right. So it -- and as of, let's say, prior to October of 2013, and even now, you can't -- I couldn't go and take a horde of bitcoins to someone and then cash it for them without it showing up on the block chain, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right.
MR. DRATEL: Because they are not physical, they are a digital instrument, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is a digital instrument, yes.
MR. DRATEL: It doesn't exist outside of a digital character?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Just those coins but they are not widely used.
MR. DRATEL: And it was started in 2008 or so, right, it was invented, essentially?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. I think the white paper that originally, the concept of it was around 2008.
MR. DRATEL: And the person who essentially invented them hasn't yet revealed themselves, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Not publicly, no.
MR. DRATEL: And it is a bit of a cottage industry to try and identify that person, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is.
MR. DRATEL: Now, each bitcoin has a unique digital identity, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Each one, yeah, as I understand it, has it's unique signature to it, in a sense, or unique string to it.
MR. DRATEL: And some of the elements of bitcoin are designed to prevent fraud, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I mean, the whole network itself, I mean, it's very well documented, I mean, throughout the whole network.
MR. DRATEL: Well, you can't duplicate a bitcoin, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: You can't, or you can?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know. There has been speculation. I am not sure. I am not technical enough to say that it can't be.
MR. DRATEL: But it can't be counterfeited?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Not that I am aware of, no.
MR. DRATEL: And it can't be -- well, withdrawn.
Now, when you talked about -- on your direct you talked about acquiring bitcoins and you were talking about you how you did it by putting cash into an account, getting bitcoins back, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: But there are other ways to acquire bitcoins, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There are other ways, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Can you describe what you understand to be bitcoin mining, m-i-n-i-n-g?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: So bitcoin mining is the process of creating a bitcoin, and that is -- someone that mines would generally use a computer to specifically run a series of it is called algorithms that will try to mathematically create this like perfect string which was of all the different transactions. It confirms them. Once it is confirmed it becomes a part of a block. Once you solve a block, you get a bitcoin. And right now there is rewards that are given. And it has been -- I think it is 25 bitcoins right now you get for each block you solve as a miner, but it takes a lot of computing power. So the thing to take away from it is it takes a lot of computing power to solve this block and to be awarded these bitcoins. But people do it and try to run computers all the time to try and mine and get these rewards.
MR. DRATEL: So it is essentially not necessarily free but you don't have to pay for them, you have to -- you earn them essentially by --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Electricity is what people weigh it against generally, the cost to run their computers, but, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: And those aren't -- I mean, those are still authorized bitcoins, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, they are.
MR. DRATEL: Because the bitcoin universe is limited, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is at 21 million.
MR. DRATEL: One of the theories of the person who invented bitcoin was that it have a cap, and bitcoins are created periodically until that cap will be reached at some point, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that's supposed to protect the valuation of bitcoin as opposed to -- I don't want to get too technical about it but monetary policy; that is why it is nongovernmental?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: To set a limit, I think.
MR. DRATEL: By the way, you talked about computing power just a second ago. You defined a server as a computer that would run a website.
Silk Road had servers, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Not just an ordinary computer running it, it had -- it is a complex operation to run, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right. Basically, I just described it as a computer but, yeah, it is a server.
MR. DRATEL: Silk Road, you have servers with significant computing power, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: As I understood, yeah, they were ones that could operate a website that's more heavy in traffic.
MR. DRATEL: Now, you also mentioned on direct that the value of a bitcoin fluctuates constantly?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It does.
MR. DRATEL: And in April of 2013 the market eclipsed $1 billion for the first time, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And when you first got involved in the investigation, it was worth a couple of dollars, right, per bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And then you said that there was a point in 2013 where it went up to about 250, $250 per bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And then by the time of Mr. Ulbricht's arrest it was down to $100 per bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Around 100, 117, somewhere in there.
MR. DRATEL: Then after his arrest it went up again, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It spiked dramatically.
MR. DRATEL: Dramatically?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah, after his arrest.
MR. DRATEL: Up to a thousand dollars for a bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Over a thousand dollars.
MR. DRATEL: So people who were holding bitcoins at the time of Mr. Ulbricht's arrest and thereafter could really make a killing, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe there is a lot of people who made money, yeah, off of that.
MR. DRATEL: And the more bitcoins you have, obviously, the more money you are going to make on that transaction, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Have you ever seen a graph of bitcoin valuation over time?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I have.
MR. DRATEL: I show you what is marked as Defendant's B, for boy, and ask you if that is a representation of the fluctuation of the bitcoin marketplace from its inception through today -- not today, through this week?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It looks accurate, yes.
MR. DRATEL: I move Defendant's B in evidence, your Honor.
MR. TURNER: No objection.
THE COURT: Received.
(Defendant's Exhibit B received in evidence)
MR. DRATEL: Could we publish it, please.
It actually looks like that mountain.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: OK. So going back to 2011, if we look at the start in 2011, we see it is very close to zero, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was, yeah, approximately 2 to $4 or so at that point.
MR. DRATEL: Then in 2013 is when it really starts to move, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And then it goes down -- there is a spike in the early part of 2013, and then it goes back down to somewhere in the hundreds, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That spike was at $250.
MR. DRATEL: I'm sorry. Do you have the --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Laser pointer? Yes.
MR. DRATEL: Can I borrow yours?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Do you want it?
MR. DRATEL: I will just point it out.
MR. DRATEL: So there is a little spike in the middle of 2011, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is about a $20 spike I believe it went up to.
MR. DRATEL: By the way, just -- and that is zero, right, that line there?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The line is zero, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So there we have in the early part of 2013, it goes up to about 250, as you stated, right?
Then it goes back down until the latter part of 2013, and this spike right here is after Mr. Ulbricht's arrest, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was, I believe, like starting around mid/late October, yes.
(Continued on next page)
MR. DRATEL: And that goes up to over a thousand dollars per bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I think the highest is around a thousand or 1200.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know what it is now?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe it's around $300 bitcoin.
MR. DRATEL: So even though a lot of bitcoin use may have been attributable to Silk Road, it survives Silk Road?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It survives Silk Road; yes.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, it's now used or accepted by certain large vendors, right, ordinary vendors? I'm not talking about Tor or illegal. Overstock.com accepts bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. It's starting to hit other websites and other -- the mainstream.
MR. DRATEL: Certain casinos accept it?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I think there's a university that you can pay tuition with it.
MR. DRATEL: Now, you talked about the tumbler, right, on Silk Road?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I did.
MR. DRATEL: Just to refresh the jury, tumbler -- I'll just try to explain it shorthand -- which is something that's designed to create confusion about which specific bitcoins are involved in a specific transaction. Is that a fair statement?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's a fair statement.
MR. DRATEL: And do you know whether Silk -- do you know when Silk Road instituted tumbler?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know when they instituted it, no.
MR. DRATEL: Do you know if Silk Road actually used a tumbler?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They advertised it in and I also did my own research through the block chain of transactions that I would move into Silk Road and out of Silk Road, and I observed from patterns that would resemble that of a tumbler.
MR. DRATEL: And those started in 2012?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah, the bitcoin --
MR. DRATEL: In other words, your transactions --
MR. DRATEL: -- that would you monitor?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: 2012, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So you were able, because you -- and you could see both sides of a bitcoin transaction, right --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: -- you were able to do some tracing, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was; yes.
MR. DRATEL: Even with a tumbler, you were able to do some tracing? Or even if they were tumbled, you were able to do some tracing?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. There were accounts that we believed belonged to Silk Road that were so high in volume at the time that -- and they would stop after we would deposit money and that would lead us to believe that that belongs to Silk Road, and we'd be able to trace other transactions to that account.
MR. DRATEL: And that started in 2012?
MR. DRATEL: And you never heard of Mr. Ulbricht until September of 2013, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: Now, based on your training and experience, you concluded that the system was likely designed by someone with a high level of technical expertise concerning the operation of bitcoins, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It appears so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, Silk Road had a lot of sophistication, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was sophisticated; yes.
MR. DRATEL: And I mean that in a computer way as well as marketing and business oriented, right?
MR. DRATEL: In fact, it used leading-edge encryption-based technologies, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It did, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And encryption-based technologies is really about security, right?
MR. DRATEL: And you reported, right, that the operators of the website are believed to be highly experienced web administrators that take precautionary steps to protect themselves and their users, right?
MR. DRATEL: Would they be the type of people who would leave handwritten notes in a wastebasket?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: At this point, I don't know. I couldn't say whether they would or wouldn't.
MR. DRATEL: You called it a complex criminal enterprise, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I did.
MR. DRATEL: And you used multiple confidential informants throughout the course of your investigation, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I did.
MR. DRATEL: Now, you have Mr. Ulbricht's passport still up there?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I do.
MR. DRATEL: And his birthdate is March 27, 1984?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it is.
MR. DRATEL: So in late 2010, he would be -- he would have been 26?
MR. DRATEL: Now, you said on direct Silk Road operated like a lot of other websites, correct, that operate on the ordinary Internet?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was similar, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And we saw on the left-hand side all the categories of merchandise, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And by the time you were on the site in December of 2011, it had about 2,000 or so products for sale, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I think that first screen shot was about April for the 2,000 products. For the drugs, the earlier ones I think were less.
MR. DRATEL: Yeah, but I'm saying 2,000 products for sale total --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Total or so --
MR. DRATEL: -- like in December of 2011?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That would be about correct, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: And there were certain items -- by the time you got on the site, there were certain items that were forbidden, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: Child pornography, counterfeit currency, weapons of mass destruction, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: And in fact, on the site it said -- and this is November of 2011 -- on the site it said please do not list anything whose purpose is to harm or defraud, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit currency, personal info, assassinations, weapons of mass destruction, chemical/bio weaponry, nukes and anything used to make them. Please do not post anything related to pedophilia. To allow listings of items designed to defraud or harm innocent people would be to stoop to the level of the very people we are standing up to.
Right, that's what it said on the site?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That remained, yeah, throughout the site.
MR. DRATEL: Now, you interviewed -- as you said before, you interviewed some people who had ordered drugs and you'd go and then confront them sometimes, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, I would.
MR. DRATEL: And they weren't of any help really in identifying Dread Pirate Roberts?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. They only helped with the vendors.
MR. DRATEL: And those vendors didn't give you access in terms of to who Dread Pirate Roberts was, right?
MR. DRATEL: Now, you mentioned that it was -- one of the seizures that was tested -- sorry. Withdrawn. One of the undercover buys that you made of the 50 or so undercover buys that you made from Silk Road, that one tested negative for drugs, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: But do you know how many other sales or scams or frauds that didn't provide real drugs in exchange for bitcoin?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know how many, no.
MR. DRATEL: And it's kind of difficult for the consumer to go to the police or the fraud bureau for that, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It would be, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: In one way that it differed from ordinary websites in some respects is that the vendors would come and go, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, they would.
MR. DRATEL: They would vanish for a little bit, come back, vanish. It was not that kind of organization or continuity that you would find for, let's say, Amazon where sellers were there?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. Some would stay for longer periods. Others would disappear periodically and then just reappear. And sometimes, they'd leave for a larger period and come back.
MR. DRATEL: Now, with respect to the commissions that Silk Road charged on transactions, January 2012 was when the commission structure changed, correct, and you put in those exhibits. And you verified that in September of 2012 when you opened up your first vendor account?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That was an account we took over.
MR. DRATEL: Sorry. When you assumed control of the vendor account.
Now, do you know the volume of transactions before you had access to the site? I don't mean access in terms of with a vendor account or something when you first went on the site.
You don't know the volume of transactions just from going on the site at that point, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I do not know that, no.
MR. DRATEL: And have you studied that since in terms of the volume over time?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I've looked at -- there was other reports that are done by universities. Carnegie Mellon did a report where they did an analysis and I reviewed that which was based upon the feedback that was in the marketplace. So I reviewed their work they did, as well as I've seen results that came later on off of servers.
MR. DRATEL: So 2013 was a huge year, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm sorry?
MR. DRATEL: 2013 was a huge year for Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was a larger year, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: There was a big spike in volume?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The listings went up; yes.
MR. DRATEL: Now, the silkroadmarket.org, that is something on the ordinary Internet, right, was?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And the only way we have it is because of something called archive.org, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right.
MR. DRATEL: And archive.org is an organization that is dedicated to capturing everything on the Internet, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They capture everything on the regular Internet.
MR. DRATEL: Not Tor?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Not anything that's on Tor, but on the ordinary Internet, archive.org's purpose is to try to capture everything?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It takes screen shots regularly over time and it documents that on its website, that you can view a website and the screen shots that it took.
MR. DRATEL: Right. So if I put in Silk Road, that's all you come up with, is that Silk Road market.org, right, if you did that research?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It would lead you specifically to that URL, yes, it would pull up silkroadmarket.org.
MR. DRATEL: And that's the way for people to see historic pages on the Internet that don't exist anymore, that you just can't get. You type in a URL and the page no longer exists, right, when you get that kind of message, you can try archive.org to see whether something is there?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. And it will show if there's changes done also. You can change a web page over to reflect different things.
MR. DRATEL: So that silkmarket.org was just one page, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was just one page.
MR. DRATEL: Silkroadmarket.org?
MR. DRATEL: And that was a page essentially both -- if people put in Silk Road into their ordinary Internet computer, that they might get that and then be directed to Silk Road on Tor because it kind of told you how to get there, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that page stopped operating in April of 2012, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe that's correct; yes.
MR. DRATEL: And there were changes throughout to the site over time, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The silkroadmarket.org?
MR. DRATEL: No, I'm sorry. Let's go back to dot-onion.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Okay.
MR. DRATEL: So, right, the site is changed in some ways over time, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was a whole new format in appearance to the site after I think it was in late 2012.
MR. DRATEL: Also, even before that, did you know from reviewing forum messages and things like that, right, that in June of 2011, June 11 of 2011 in particular that there was a message that the site was closed for a while and that it would reopen in July, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: From what I read on previous articles, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And that it was going to split into two sites and you've seen that post, right, the one where it's going to split into two sites?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't recall offhand.
MR. DRATEL: Well, one -- but you testified --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Oh, the forum you're talking about? Yes.
MR. DRATEL: It split into two sites, the marketplace and the forum?
MR. DRATEL: And you've seen that post that announced that, right?
MR. DRATEL: And that's June 2011?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
THE COURT: Mr. Dratel, just for a couple of more minutes.
MR. DRATEL: This is a good time.
THE COURT: Oh, this is a good time?
MR. DRATEL: Yes.
THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen, we'll take our lunch break now and pick up again at 2:00. So, again, just to remind you folks, most of you, if are able, to get yourself ready to come out here a couple minutes before 2:00 so we can come on out.
I want to remind you not to talk to anybody about this case, including each other. And if anybody tries to talk to you about this case, to avoid them and just walk away and then to let Joe know, all right.
We'll see you after lunch. Thank you.
(Jury excused)
(Continued on next page)
(In open court; jury not present)
THE COURT: All right, ladies and gentlemen, be seated.
Let's see if there are things that we need to take up. One thing that I wanted to mention is that I had not appreciated for some reason before just a little while ago that the conspiracy charge is not only an 841(a)(1) charge, but also an 841(h) charge; that is, given my comments about scope a significant difference, and I wanted to state that on the record. I have to think through what the implications of that are, but that is different from what I had been thinking.
It certainly doesn't alter my ruling in terms of the bottom-line orders on the rulings which I had issued, though the scope, it is potentially the case that the scope would cause me less concern for an 841(h) than otherwise. I have to think that through.
The other point that I wanted to raise was that Mr. Dratel had objected to a portion of the witness' answer where an individual who was being arrested, I believe, an alleged seller --
MR. DRATEL: Purchaser, your Honor. Never mind. I thought he was --
THE COURT: Was he a purchaser?
MR. DRATEL: I think he was a purchaser because I think the testimony was essentially that when they confronted him with the package, he said, yeah, he ordered it off of Silk Road.
MR. TURNER: My recollection was it was a vendor.
THE COURT: I thought it was a vendor, too. In any event, the reason I allowed that in was because, number one, it was responsive to the question in terms of presenting his knowledge; but also to the extent that there was a statement against interest under 804, it would have come in and there would have been the requisite unavailability given the timing and the reasonableness of getting someone here that quickly. So that's the basis of what I was stating because it was to support the facts that the witness had been asked to testify about.
Are there any things which you folks would like to state now or issues that we should go through before we take our own lunch break? I do not have a matter in here during the lunch break. I have a meeting someplace else. You are welcome to all stay here as you see fit.
MR. DRATEL: I just wanted to project that this went faster than I anticipated in large part because of the witness' cooperative manner, so obviously that's very helpful and efficient. I'm coming to a more dense part, so it's hard to say. I think at least another two hours is my guess.
THE COURT: So the government can plan around that in terms of getting your next witness, Mr. Turner, on deck. That I think you had previously stated was Kiernan.
MR. TURNER: Thomas Kiernan.
THE COURT: So it will be Kiernan either way, so if we start, it's possible Mr. Kiernan may get on the stand sometime between 3:00 and 5:00.
MR. DRATEL: I don't think he would be on before 4:00.
THE COURT: So 4:00, so between 4:00 and 5:00 maybe.
MR. DRATEL: We'll see how it goes.
THE COURT: If you think you're going to beat 4:00, let us know; otherwise, the government will have Mr. Kiernan here at 4:00.
MR. DRATEL: I will reevaluate at lunch what I think based on how it went this morning.
THE COURT: Right. Understood. Anything further that we should go over right now?
MR. TURNER: No, your Honor.
MR. DRATEL: No, your Honor.
THE COURT: Let me say one thing to the press also. I would ask you folks not to approach any of the jurors or to the extent that you're communicating with anybody else from your office to have them approach the jurors. Obviously, it creates issues with juror misconduct or potential bias. They're not having any misconduct on their part. It's misconduct with the jury.
I had the occasion to speak to other judges in the courthouse regarding what they have done in the past. They have actually excluded the newspapers or the press itself from the courtroom, not all, the offender member of the press and/or his or her paper or if it's not a newspaper, it's an Internet source.
I'm not doing that right now. I just wanted to let you folks know what would be one of the potential courses of action that would be recommended to be taken at that time if we had another repeat.
Thank you. We're adjourned for lunch.
(Luncheon recess)
(Continued on next page)
AFTERNOON SESSION 2:05 p.m.
COURT CLERK: All rise for the jury.
(In open court; jury present)
THE COURT: Mr. Dratel, you may proceed now.
MR. DRATEL: Thank you. JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN,
CROSS-EXAMINATION CONTINUED BY MR. DRATEL:
MR. DRATEL: Good afternoon, Agent Der-Yeghiayan.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Good afternoon.
MR. DRATEL: Ross Ulbricht, you learned during the course of your investigation he was an Eagle Scout?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I did.
MR. DRATEL: And that he was living in that house in San Francisco, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There's I think there were two residents I knew of.
MR. DRATEL: I'm saying he was in there. There were others, as well, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: He shared that with other people?
MR. DRATEL: He was not the owner of the house, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't believe so, no.
MR. DRATEL: You said that in his bedroom, you found credit cards, bank statements, things like that, the passport, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you investigated all of that, correct?
MR. DRATEL: Because it was important to try to find out about money, right, bitcoin and location?
MR. DRATEL: And there was discussion -- withdrawn. And there was a concern about, not concern, but there was an interest in how and when and in what quantity Mr. Ulbricht may have cashed out bitcoins, right?
MR. DRATEL: Now, you, as a law enforcement officer in an undercover capacity, occupied and controlled the account for cirrus on Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: From July from July on; yes.
MR. DRATEL: From July -- late July, you said about the 26th, 27th of 2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Around -- correct, around that date.
MR. DRATEL: And cirrus is C-I-R-R-U-S, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that previously had been the account for scout?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct. The original operator that started the cirrus account was scout before that.
MR. DRATEL: And scout changed it to cirrus before you took it over, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Scout -- the person that operated scout account created the cirrus account.
MR. DRATEL: About two or three weeks after you got control of the cirrus account, DPR, Dread Pirate Roberts, granted you administrative rights over the Wiki page?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I had the chat from one of the dates, but yes, it was granted to me when I was controlling it.
MR. DRATEL: Did August 16 sound about right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Sounds about right; yes.
MR. DRATEL: You were given only limited privileges, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was given a level -- second level underneath admin privileges.
MR. DRATEL: You never spoke to DPR on the telephone, right?
MR. DRATEL: You never communicated in a ordinary Internet electronic communication?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Nothing outside of Tor.
MR. DRATEL: Right. And the same was true of the other -- to your knowledge from your investigation and your interaction with the other administrators, the same was true with them as well, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I didn't engage with them outside of Tor either.
MR. DRATEL: Right. But I'm saying they didn't engage with DPR outside of Tor?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Not from what they told me.
MR. DRATEL: And you saw no evidence of that in the course of your investigation?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. There were a few that were closer connected to him than me, but not -- they didn't ever say that.
MR. DRATEL: DPR would you say was careful to conceal his identity?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I think he was.
MR. DRATEL: And he set up a series of security measures on the site such as this tiered level of access even for administrators and employees?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He did.
MR. DRATEL: Now, for Government Exhibit 127, it's already in evidence.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: 127. Okay.
MR. DRATEL: It's up there. These are the instructions that you were given by DPR on how to get administrative access, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: To clarify, this was given to the person --
MR. DRATEL: I'm sorry?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm sorry.
MR. DRATEL: This was given to cirrus before you were cirrus?
MR. DRATEL: In essence -- now, did you learn how to get on the site from the person who was operating the cirrus account or did you go to this page to get the information?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: The person that operated the cirrus account walked me through the steps.
MR. DRATEL: So, in essence, it was not a difficult process for someone to walk someone through the process of getting access, as long as you had the right password or access code?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was a little more complicated to set up than I was -- my previous knowledge before that with dealing with, like, an IRC type of setting like this, but it was -- with the directions it was simple.
MR. DRATEL: And you follow the directions, and you had, instead of that username and that password, if that was for DPR, that would get you DPR's access, right?
In other words, you know where it says 8b username? So if that were in DPR's username and if 8c and 8d were DPR, it wouldn't be any different to get into the DPR-level of access, right?
MR. TURNER: Objection; form.
THE COURT: Hold on one second. Let me read it.
Why don't you rephrase.
MR. DRATEL: This is information that cirrus was given to log on, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: So it's a username, a domain, is that a, b, c and d. There's a username, domain and password that allow a certain amount of access, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I guess so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: If you had the information for DPR's username, domain and password, that's how you would get to -- there's no other way to get in the site to your knowledge other than through this, just with a different password and a different domain and different username?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't -- I wouldn't know how he got in. I know that there's -- there are different ways to access servers or there are different ways to access programs. I don't know if he would do this from, like, almost a front-face way that you do this. I'm not sure. Hypothetically, yes, I'm guessing it is possible to do it that way, too.
MR. DRATEL: And in terms of logging into the Pidgin chat, and just to refresh the jury's recollection, the Pidgin chat is the little box in the upper right that you were chatting with with DPR on October 1, and you had a couple of other instances of that as well, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that's not on the Silk Road site, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. That server was separate.
MR. DRATEL: That's a separate encrypted chat system, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. It's separate dot-onion address.
MR. DRATEL: But for that one, in terms of logging on, the steps that you went through with us are the only steps for logging on, right? Nothing more complicated than that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's the only ones I know of; yes.
MR. DRATEL: But that got you on the Pidgin chat, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was a little bit different from the Adium program that cirrus was originally using, so that's why that user or the person, the original owner walked me through it because it was different than Pidgin.
MR. DRATEL: And Adium is used more on Macs, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I guess so. It was just the program that user decided to use, so I wanted to stay consistent.
MR. DRATEL: You talked about timezones on that, right? And you're aware that Adium has a plugin, meaning an additional option that you can use to adjust the timezone?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm not sure about a plugin for it, but I never did it.
MR. DRATEL: And the timezone that's reflected on that, that's really just a timezone of the person's computer who is logging on, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm assuming that that's the computer, yes, the computer's time.
MR. DRATEL: So if you set your computer in a different timezone -- withdrawn.
You can set your computer to a different time than the time, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: You can set your computer to any timezone you want.
MR. DRATEL: So all that does is tell you where the computer timezone is, not where the computer is, but what timezone is provided to that --is programmed to that computer; is that accurate?
MR. DRATEL: Programmed to that computer?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's accurate. You can modify your timezone on the computer and that doesn't reflect where you're at at the timezone. You can put anywhere in the world.
MR. DRATEL: Also, those chats, don't they also contain a line, and we can look at it if you need to, but it says encrypted OTR chat initiated identity not verified the other side, right? Don't they say that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There's OTR different plugins, I guess, that allow you to do it. It stands for off-the-record chats.
MR. DRATEL: What I'm saying is, the ones that you've testified about, don't they say that? There's sort of a line that says it's encrypted, but the other side is not verified?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, yeah. When you first start it up, all the chats I had with the staff would always initiate the OTR setting, so it would turn on every time I start a chat.
MR. DRATEL: And you said before you spent thousands of hours on the Silk Road site, right, in a variety of different roles essentially: Buyer, seller, administrator. Right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah, and just browsing, too.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Some of that, like you said, every couple of days in direct contact with DPR, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Just about, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Is it fair to say that during that entire period, DPR never let -- and I would say he, but it could be a she, right? We wouldn't know just from the screen, right? I mean, in essence, you don't know who you're talking to, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: From a user account, yeah, it could be a he or she.
MR. DRATEL: DPR never let his or her guard down to give you a piece of personal information that enabled you to establish identity; is that fair to say?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know. For gender-wise, I didn't never really see anything that would indicate that it was a he, but some of the writing just appeared to be more masculine to me from reviewing it.
MR. DRATEL: I'm not talking about gender. I'm just talking about in general.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Okay. No, there wouldn't be a defined, exact way to say that it was a he or she.
MR. DRATEL: Never let his guard down. By the way, you were surprised that scout was a woman, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was.
MR. DRATEL: I want to take you to the day of Mr. Ulbricht's arrest, all right. And just so it's clear, you had never seen Mr. Ulbricht in person prior to you going to California the day before?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: Did you identify him from photographs or from people pointing him out, you know, in other words, the other agents saying "that's him," or did you identify him -- in other words, did they say this is him and then when you saw the photo, you saw him?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: When I started investigating him around September tenth, 11th, it was brought to my attention. I did pull up documents such as his passport application, the photograph. I saw other photographs as well that I found online of him.
MR. DRATEL: So that's how you were able to recognize him?
MR. DRATEL: He didn't have any kind of markedly -- or different appearance that would prevent you from recognizing him?
MR. DRATEL: You had never spoken to Mr. Ulbricht before that time, in other words, voice contact or anything else to your knowledge in terms of Ross Ulbricht?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I had not.
MR. DRATEL: Now, I think you testified on direct that you wanted -- that the plan was to try to have Mr. Ulbricht out in public for purposes of effecting the arrest, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that would be so he would be more vulnerable that way in terms of -- obviously in terms of just the immediacy of the arrest and your ability to track and all that, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. We had an arrest warrant, so we were -- wanted to initiate that in those settings.
MR. DRATEL: And you didn't, as cirrus, or anyone else to your knowledge didn't coax him out of his house, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No, I did not.
MR. DRATEL: So he left his residence voluntarily, right, to go to, the day before you noted, to a public Wi-Fi spot, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And then the next day, went to the cafe and then did not stay at the cafe but instead went to the public library?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Was never coaxed out that I know of.
MR. DRATEL: Right, right. But it was the plan to get him online during that period, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Mr. Ulbricht himself, we would be observing him if he went to an area that would provide public Wi-Fi and then, yes, try to initiate a chat with Dread Pirate Roberts online.
MR. DRATEL: By the way, you mentioned the passport and you seized the passport from his residence, right? That's an authentic U.S. passport, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It's an authentic U.S. passport.
MR. DRATEL: And so, if we could pull up 129C, please.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Okay.
MR. DRATEL: And that's the chat that you were having at the time of Mr. Ulbricht's arrest, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And so, you initiated, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I initiated the chat; yes.
MR. DRATEL: And then you asked him can you check out one of the flagged messages for me, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: And dread says sure. And then the next thing he says is let me log in, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: So he needs to log into silkroad, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: To log into the market, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So he's already on the Internet. He's already active, so you're chatting with him, but until you ask him, he's not logged into silkroad, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I -- it doesn't appear he's logged on to silkroad.
MR. DRATEL: And then -- by the way, you know what happens when you log in as -- withdrawn.
Do you know whether or not if one logs in as DPR, as Dread Pirate Roberts onto the silkroad site, whether or not the mastermind page comes up automatically? Do you know?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I do not know.
MR. DRATEL: Did you ever test it?
MR. DRATEL: During that period in the library, you're aware that there are law enforcement officers in the library, you're not sure who but you know there are people watching him, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's correct.
MR. DRATEL: And to your knowledge no one -- withdrawn.
Mr. Ulbricht still had his laptop out on a library desk, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: As I was told by other agents there.
MR. DRATEL: By the way, with respect to the mastermind, going back to the mastermind screen, you said that Mr. Kiernan is a computer scientist?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He is.
MR. DRATEL: That's how you described him. So you had to tell him to hit the "back" tab to find the previous screen?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I asked him if he could go back. I think he was trying to keep it in a place or trying to keep the computer just active and alive so it wouldn't -- the encryption wouldn't turn back on or wouldn't lock. So he wasn't actively, as far as I could tell, doing anything on the screen besides keeping it alive at that point.
MR. DRATEL: So before that chat, 129C on October 1, 2013, what was the time before that that you communicated with DPR?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe I had a chat. I have to look back at my logs.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, it was a couple of days, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It might have been a few days before. Actually, earlier I think in the day, I think I had a short chat with him or it might have been -- I got to doublecheck.
MR. DRATEL: That day?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Not -- I'm saying earlier the day before I left maybe.
MR. DRATEL: Weren't you concerned that -- withdrawn.
Wasn't it unusual for him not to be on what you call the IRC for two days?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: On the staff chat?
MR. DRATEL: Yes.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It would be a little bit unusual but there were periods that he would take some time off.
MR. DRATEL: But did that concern you at some point? I mean, did you talk to the other agents and ask them whether they got physical surveillance because Dread Pirate Roberts had not been on the staff chat for over two days and that was unusual?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I think he was online. I hadn't been engaging him in chat, though.
MR. DRATEL: Do you recall?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm sorry?
MR. DRATEL: Do you recall specifically?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'd have to look back at my records to --
MR. DRATEL: I'm going to show you what's marked as 3505, 36 and 37. Just ask you to -- if you don't mind, I'll just point out to you where I prefer that you read rather than take time. So that and then through there. It goes up obviously from the oldest quote. Start on page 37 I think is how it works.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Okay.
(Continued on next page)
MR. DRATEL: So you wanted to know from Agent Tarbell whether they had physical surveillance because you said that not logging into IRC for over two days is unusual for DPR, right?
MR. DRATEL: There is also something else. Do you recall that on the 29th, which is two days before, that you noticed someone with a username peaceloveharmony was what you called sitting on DPR's profile for a couple of hours; do you recall that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: If I could see something that would help me recollect?
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: I show you what's marked 3505-00775, and just ask you, again, read from the bottom to the top, essentially.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Sure.
(Pause)
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I recall this.
MR. DRATEL: Thank you. So there was a period on the 29th of September, 2013, where someone with a username or a screen name peaceloveharmony was what you called sitting on DPR's account?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. There was from the forums, on the Silk Road forums, there is a way to see what users were viewing actively in the forums, and what I mean by "sitting" on an account, they were viewing the profile of Dread Pirate Roberts for an extended period of time.
MR. DRATEL: And so you asked the people on the arrest team as to whether it was any of them, essentially, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: If there was anyone else that was monitoring him.
MR. DRATEL: Right. And they said no, that it was not them?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right. The responses I got from the other agents that I was working with said no.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Your conclusion was that it might be law enforcement, some other law enforcement that you were unaware of?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I suspected, yes.
MR. DRATEL: But it didn't have to be law enforcement, it could have been anyone?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It could have been anyone, yea.
MR. DRATEL: But it was unusual, right; it wasn't typical activity that someone would be monitoring that profile for that extended period of time?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I didn't actually watch them for a long time. I was watching his account and watching the forums more vigilantly, actively for the last few days. So that's why I took notice of that.
MR. DRATEL: And you had spent a fair amount of time yourself as law enforcement doing that very thing, right, sort of trolling through that account for periods, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: And watching it, yes.
MR. DRATEL: While you were doing that, were other people doing it at the same time? Do you recall anyone else doing it?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Generally me. I believe Special Agent Gary Alford also was watching the account on the forums as well.
MR. DRATEL: But he wasn't peaceloveharmony; we don't know who that is?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I said it to him and he said no.
MR. DRATEL: I just said, we don't know who peaceloveharmony is?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know who peaceloveharmony is.
MR. DRATEL: Now, is it fair to say that the Silk Road site, that users, both vendors and purchasers, were extremely security conscious?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: A lot of them were, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And there was a lot of talk on the forum about keeping track of law enforcement infiltration or attempts to infiltrate the site?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was discussions about that, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And they actively discussed prior arrests and what happened to people and rumors and all of that kind of stuff?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There would be discussions about that regularly on the forums.
MR. DRATEL: Would you say they were very motivated in finding out more about what law enforcement is doing with the Silk Road?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was a lot of discussion. If there was anyone that would ever bring up something that would occur with law enforcement, then they would like to discuss that a lot.
MR. DRATEL: Now, in April of 2012, you believe you had identified some Silk Road bitcoin accounts, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That would be correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you were working to further identify the people behind them, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And sometime in the summer, maybe July of 2012, you believed that you had identified the person, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe that I had a good target for it, potentially.
MR. DRATEL: A good target, Mark Karpeles, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Karpeles and an associate of his.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Ashley Barr, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Karpeles is K-a-r-p-e-l-e-s.
Mark Karpeles is a French citizen, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: He lives in Japan, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He does.
MR. DRATEL: He is also the owner of Mt. Gox, correct, the bitcoin exchange?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And he bought Mt. Gox I think in 2009?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I think it was 2010.
MR. DRATEL: OK. But you thought that -- what you had concluded there was that Karpeles was essentially behind Silk Road but that his associate Ashley Barr was DPR?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was -- Karpeles' English that I could see from his -- the things he would write online did not match the level of English skills that Dread Pirate Roberts possessed. So I thought it was someone else close to him, and there was a person that shared some of the same viewpoints that was working for him by the name of Ashley Barr that I suspected.
MR. DRATEL: He was a Canadian, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He was a Canadian citizen.
MR. DRATEL: And has a degree in computer science, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He has computer science degrees, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And he is also Karpeles' right-hand man, or was at the time, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He was.
MR. DRATEL: And so as a result you built up quite a large list of information to lead you to that, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There is little bits and pieces of evidence that was pointing the investigation towards them, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And -- well, did you say we had built up quite a large list of information to lead us to this?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was, yeah, a lot of little pieces, a list of exhibits. It was a lot of little things that added up to it.
MR. DRATEL: The question is did you not say inside Homeland Security Investigations, HSI, we had built up quite a large list of information to lead us to this?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That sounds right.
MR. DRATEL: And you also didn't want anybody reaching out to Karpeles, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was other --
MR. DRATEL: Just let me ask because I will get to that.
MR. DRATEL: I want to get to --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Other law enforcement I didn't want reaching out.
MR. DRATEL: Right. You were worried that if someone reached out or did something that Karpeles might find out, it could impair the investigation?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Right. So -- and in fact, you let people know within law enforcement that Karpeles, he closely monitors everything, all of his websites?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that you thought that a lot of the websites he ran -- and he ran a lot of websites, right? He had a lot of domain names and things like that within his control?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He hosted a lot of websites, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So you advised avoiding visiting them since many of them appeared to be fronts and that Karpeles is actively tracking them?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: So that if someone went on and wasn't sufficiently disguised, then he might recognize it as law enforcement and then again impair the investigation?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, in August of 2012 you sent out an email and then you realized, as we all do at some point in our lives, that you left out the word "not," right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There might have been an occasion like that.
MR. DRATEL: You had to send a quick email to say not to --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Not to, I think, maybe contact --
MR. DRATEL: Right. That was an important facet of the investigation, obviously, is to keep it as confidential and as close as possible as you gathered more information?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And at some point because -- withdrawn.
It came to your knowledge that there were other investigations of Silk Road going on around the country, right? Other agencies, other offices, I mean, were investigating Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you -- when I say "you," HSI, and yourself as a part of HSI, were operating with or working in tandem with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Northern District of Illinois, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: We were docketed there originally, yes.
MR. DRATEL: You did that in Chicago, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right.
MR. DRATEL: So that is where you were running your investigation out of. Those were the assistant U.S. attorneys that you were talking to and keeping them advised of your progress?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And there are obviously other U.S. attorneys offices around the country and other agencies that were not necessarily either aware or in contact with Chicago about what they were doing?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was, yeah, we were doing our best to try to deconflict with other districts.
MR. DRATEL: At some point you learned that Baltimore had an investigation, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And, actually, you learned that from Agent Alford?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. Baltimore, the HSI agent that originally opened the case and their supervisor came to Chicago originally to talk to us about their investigation and about working together.
MR. DRATEL: It wasn't in August of 2012 that someone from the Organized Crime Task Force told you that Chicago had input the same information about Karpeles as a target as you had?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was notified of that, about Karpeles, later on, but I knew of their investigation long before that, though.
MR. DRATEL: And in January of 2013 you got permission to open up an undercover bank account to try to move money through Mt. Gox, the bitcoin exchanger, just to remind everybody, right? It is the largest bitcoin exchanger, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was at the time.
MR. DRATEL: It was at the time.
And other companies owned by Karpeles, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And so you got permission to do that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I got permission to open up under our investigation an undercover bank account, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Right. Now, Karpeles is also a computer developer systems administrator, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Self-proclaimed hacker?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Who brags about his hacking in Twitter and other social media.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He does.
MR. DRATEL: And he has control over hundreds of websites and companies, or had at the time in 2012/2013?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He did have hosting services, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And you believed him to be the mastermind behind keeping Silk Road secure and operating?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He had ties to the original silkroadmarket.org website.
MR. DRATEL: But my question is did you not say that you believed him to be the mastermind behind keeping the website secure and operating?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He had the credentials to do so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: But did you say that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I would have said that, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And that Ashley Barr was acting as the voice of the website under the name Dread Pirate Roberts?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That's what I suspected, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Now, in April of 2013, Chicago initiated -- when I say "Chicago," HSI Chicago, your office, right -- initiated an undercover purchase from Silk Road using Mt. Gox and another Karpeles company as the bitcoin exchange?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. We did an exchange through two different ways.
MR. DRATEL: Part of the purpose of that was to -- withdrawn.
You also suspected that Karpeles was running an unlicensed money exchange operation, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I did.
MR. DRATEL: And so this could be a way of establishing jurisdiction to charge him with that in Chicago?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, it was.
MR. DRATEL: And in May of 2013, HSI Chicago issued a grand jury subpoena to a company called Dwolla, right, D-w-o-l-l-a?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that is an online payment processing system?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah. It's like an online wire transfer company.
MR. DRATEL: It is based in the United States, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, yes. It has service in the United States.
MR. DRATEL: It was a way that Mt. Gox used to transfer money essentially in and out of the U.S.?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was one of the ways that they offered to either withdraw or deposit funds.
MR. DRATEL: And bitcoin, right? It was part of the bitcoin exchange process that Mt. Gox used?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was used for just the money part of it to withdraw.
MR. DRATEL: And that was -- and the subpoena was with regard to a Karpeles company called -- and I will spell it -- M-u-t-u-m, new word, S-i-g-i-l-l-u-m?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Mutum Sigillum.
MR. DRATEL: Right. That was what the subpoena was for, the records for that company, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And the grand jury subpoena keeps the investigation secret and confidential, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: Within law enforcement only?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right.
MR. DRATEL: Then you find out the next day, May 10, 2013, that Baltimore had seized the -- how do you pronounce it, the Mutum Sigillum?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Mutum Sigillum.
MR. DRATEL: -- Mutum Sigillum that HSI Baltimore had seized $2 million in that company's account, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: They notified me by phone, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: Then it was apparent to Karpeles that the U.S. government had him on its radar, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: This is May of 2013, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: May 10th.
In fact, there were newspaper articles about it, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was a large seizure at the time, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Sorry. More than $3 million was seized.
And it was from Mutum Sigillum's Wells Fargo account, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you were notified in advance that Baltimore was going to do that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was told that it had already happened.
MR. DRATEL: Right. And no one even in your office had been notified in advance? When I say "your office," I mean Chicago HSI.
MR. DRATEL: And was that money ultimately returned to Mr. Karpeles?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know its current state right now.
MR. DRATEL: And you thought that HSI Baltimore should have deferred that seizure because of your criminal investigation of Mr. Karpeles?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: At the time, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Now, despite that and the fact that Mr. Karpeles was already on notice, to a certain extent, that he was on your -- not your radar but the U.S. radar -- and I am not being critical, I'm just talking about despite that, in terms of the chronology, you prepared a draft affidavit of May 29, 2013 for a search warrant for email of Mr. Karpeles, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And these search warrants would not be on notice to him, correct? They would just be to the provider, and they would provide the information so that he wouldn't necessarily know, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. The provider -- well, he wouldn't know, yes, that the provider --
MR. DRATEL: So you were doing it in a way that would keep it confidential. Baltimore did it in a way where it would be public. You did it in a way that it was confidential, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: So in your draft, which was prepared for swearing under oath, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you said that Silk Road had been launched in March of 2011, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that both the marketplace and the online forum were operated by the same administrator?
This was your conclusion?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yeah, that's what I assumed, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And that you had done some -- you talked yesterday about whois.com, w-h-o-i-s.com?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Who.is, yes.
MR. DRATEL: You talked about it yesterday for the purpose of identifying IP addresses or the people behind IP addresses?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And in your draft affidavit you talked about the whois.com for the Silk Road -- the searches that you had done for the silkroadmarket.org, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And when you said before -- oh, withdrawn.
That the registration was March 1, 2011, and then that only went through April 13, 2011. And then there was a separate registration through March 30th, right, through 2012, I guess, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There were changes in the hosting administration.
MR. DRATEL: There were changes in the postings, right?
And that there was something called sta.net, a company, right, that was involved in -- well, withdrawn -- that you concluded from your investigation was involved or connected to the silkroadmarket.org?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And that was registered to Mutum Sigillum?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, yes, yeah.
MR. DRATEL: Which was Karpeles' company?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was.
MR. DRATEL: And in fact, he was the contact for Mutum Sigillum; it was listed to his email address, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: Ands that he was the administrative -- and that he was in administrative control of Mutum Sigillum since he had acquired it in 2010?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And in February 11, Karpeles bought Mt. Gox, right? I think -- I apologize before for having the wrong date, but February 11th he bought Mt. Gox?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Around February 2011.
MR. DRATEL: If you want to see the draft, I would be happy to have you -- to have it in front of you.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: If I could, yeah. That would helpful. Thank you.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: I apologize but when it printed out, the numbers cut off halfway so sometimes it is hard to tell 8's from 9's. This is 3505-3085 through 3092. Yes.
(Handing)
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Thank you.
MR. DRATEL: OK. So let's go back to paragraph 18, if you could look at that.
MR. DRATEL: And you trace more of Mr. Karpeles' sort of electronic footprint as either corporate or personal, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: In terms of how you link him through whois.com, other companies, to sta and other companies that are affiliated -- that are connected, through your research and investigation, connected to the silkroadmarket.org?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: So, in fact, if you look at 19, in February 2011, Mr. Karpeles buys Mt. Gox, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Sorry, you said 19th?
MR. DRATEL: Yes.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It stopped at 18.
MR. DRATEL: What is the last page of that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Page 5.
MR. DRATEL: On the bottom, 35 --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Oh, it is cut off. 03 --
MR. DRATEL: It is double-sided.
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It is still cut off. 03091, 92.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: I'm sorry, paragraph 17. I apologize.
MR. DRATEL: Do you have 17 there?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I have 17, yes.
MR. DRATEL: So in February 2011 -- so paragraph 17, he buys Mt. Gox in February 2011?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is when it is shown, yes.
MR. DRATEL: That is a month before Silk Road launches, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And you note there that Mt. Gox handled perhaps as much as more than 80 percent of all of the bitcoin exchange in the world, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is what they advertised, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And that was as of April 2013, right?
MR. DRATEL: And, excuse me, part of your theory in terms of your investigation was that Silk Road was a device for leveraging the value of bitcoin, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It appeared so.
MR. DRATEL: Yes. In other words, that if you had cornered the market on bitcoin and could create a site that only used bitcoin and everybody used bitcoin, you would drive the price up?
MR. DRATEL: And also get business as an exchange?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Right.
MR. DRATEL: Now, so based on that, in terms of an affidavit, you were prepared to swear that there was probable cause that Mark Karpeles was intimately involved as the head of Silk Road?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: From the connections that I listed in the affidavit draft, yes.
MR. DRATEL: But he had already been -- he had already had that seizure of Mutum Sigillum by the time you had drafted this affidavit, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Correct.
MR. DRATEL: And he was in Japan?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: He was in Japan.
MR. DRATEL: Also, around the same time, in May of 2013, you submitted to Dwolla, or subpoenaed from Dwolla, the online payment processing company here in the U.S., information about -- subscriber information for certain accounts that you thought were suspicious and related to Silk Road based on the movement of bitcoin or money in and out of there, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: There was a subpoena issued for that, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And that was because -- well, you thought that there could be vendors or operators that you could find with that information?
MR. DRATEL: And by "operators," you mean administrators, people who were running the site?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Potentially, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And there was large movement of money -- withdrawn.
There were large movements of money from Mt. Gox to Dwolla accounts?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It showed, yeah, movement of money moving out of Mt. Gox through Dwolla.
MR. DRATEL: And, by the way, on that list I think there were 16 names on that list or 16 accounts, do you recall?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't. If I could see the --
MR. DRATEL: Sure.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: But do you recall whether or not Mr. Ulbricht's name was on that list of accounts?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't believe that it was.
MR. DRATEL: And ultimately you created a spreadsheet -- or received a spreadsheet from Dwolla with all of the transactions relating to Mr. Karpeles, is that right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was all the Mutum Sigillum -- I'm sorry, in the Mutum Sigillum account for Dwolla for all the transactions that they had received and debited, credited and debited.
MR. DRATEL: That is about a thousand pages long, that --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was, yeah, a pretty large return.
MR. DRATEL: And do you recall whether Mr. Ulbricht's name comes up there?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It did.
MR. DRATEL: Right. And there are about 20 transactions, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Roughly or so, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And they are all in the amount of probably like a thousand dollars or around there, some less?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Around a thousand dollars. I think one was for like a few hundred dollars.
MR. DRATEL: So nothing large, assuming you mean by "large" more than a thousand dollars, when you are talking about large movements of money, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: No. There wasn't anything that compared to the other accounts, no.
MR. DRATEL: And those were spread out over a couple of years, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I believe so, if memory serves me right.
MR. DRATEL: In fact, even after Mr. Ulbricht's arrest you went back and looked at that, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I did.
MR. DRATEL: Now, you also learned as part of your investigation at some point in the summer of 2013 that Baltimore was trying to work on an interview with Karpeles through his attorneys, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And they wanted to ask him directly about Silk Road as well as his money business, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes, they wanted to talk to him.
MR. DRATEL: And you advised against that?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: We requested that they did not.
MR. DRATEL: Right. But they went ahead and met with his lawyers July 11, 2013, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That sounds about right, yes.
MR. DRATEL: Not with him but with his lawyers?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: With the lawyers.
MR. DRATEL: And then you say Karpeles' -- withdrawn.
Karpeles' attorneys brought up Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is what I was told.
MR. DRATEL: And they say that he was willing to tell the government who he thought was running Silk Road, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And for that he would get a walk on his charges, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know what their deal was.
MR. DRATEL: That's what he wanted?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I don't know. I don't know what was discussed then.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: OK. And during this period after this all occurred -- withdrawn.
So I am going to show you what is marked as 3505-300.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: I am just going to bracket a point here. Just read that to yourself and then when you are done let me know.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: During this period -- I'm sorry. Let me know when you are finished.
(Pause)
MR. DRATEL: During this period you were upset about the work -- about the investigation that Baltimore was pursuing and how they were pursuing it, correct?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I was upset about it, yes.
MR. DRATEL: And you wrote a long memo with a chronology to lay out what had occurred and what the problems you saw were?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: That is correct.
MR. DRATEL: And as part of your investigation, as part of your preparation and all of that, you learned that Karpeles' lawyers had made this offer that they would tell the government who was behind Silk Road if he would not be prosecuted for the money exchange charges, which, by the way, had not been instituted, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: I'm sorry.
MR. DRATEL: He hadn't been charged yet with any money exchange --
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: It was just the civil forfeiture, the civil seizure of the money.
MR. DRATEL: Right. But in return for not pursuing any potential charges against him, he was willing to give that name up? That was the offer that his lawyers made, that you learned during your investigation?
MR. TURNER: Objection. Foundation.
THE COURT: Certainly you will answer as to what you know. If you had knowledge of that fact or if your memory is refreshed by something and now recollect something, then you may testify to it.
MR. TURNER: Objection. Foundation. Hearsay as well.
THE COURT: Why don't you try and rephrase it, Mr. Dratel, and come at it in a different angle.
MR. DRATEL: Sure.
BY MR. DRATEL:
MR. DRATEL: It was crucially important to you at the time to know what was going on with respect to other pursuits of Karpeles and what was going on with other agencies investigating or other U.S. Attorney's offices investigating him, right?
MR. DRATEL: And as part of that you had conversations and read memoranda and were in touch with people who provided to you information about it so that you could pursue your own investigation correctly, right?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Be more specific. I am sorry.
MR. DRATEL: Sure. That you wanted to know what was going on with Baltimore, you wanted to know what was going on with the meeting with Karpeles' attorneys, you wanted to know what was out there because you had your own parallel independent investigation of him going on that could be completely wiped out by what Baltimore was doing?
JARED DER-YEGHIAYAN: Yes. And we had verbal agreements with the attorneys in that district also about that.
MR. DRATEL: And so in the course of this and in pursuing your investigation, you learned that Karpeles' lawyers had made that offer to the government?
MR. TURNER: Objection.
MR. DRATEL: You learned through people either in Baltimore or at HSI in Chicago?